david Site AdminPosts: 27632Joined: 04/12/2001votes: 59
07/14/2026 - 02:20 PM
The NBA has expanded its ongoing investigation into Kawhi Leonard's sponsorship
agreements, specifically looking into a second deal linked to the Aspiration
probe. This inquiry follows earlier scrutiny regarding potential undisclosed
arrangements involving the star forward. Given the complexity of these
league-wide salary cap compliance checks, the situation remains a significant
point of interest for the front office. How concerned should the organization be
about potential penalties resulting from this expanded probe?
Trueblood CNS MVP X1Posts: 2627Location: 10 miles north of INTUIT DOME votes: 19
07/14/2026 - 02:25 PM
This is what I was speculating on in the other thread. Was Aspiration gonna have Kawhi
eventually do work for the company and is any of it in writing? If so, then that's
obviously good for the Clippers
OTOH, is there any paperwork that specifically says that Kawhi DIDN'T have to do anything
and that it would be a no show endorsement? And if so, were the Clippers aware of any of
it? If so, then that would be very harmful
Also, what if there is documentation that it's a no show endorsement but the Clippers
weren't aware of anything or there is no paper trail. That was the other angle that I
was getting at. If there is just circumstantial evidence but no actual proof in
writing then I have to think you have to give the Clippers the benefit of the
doubt
Trueblood CNS MVP X1Posts: 2627Location: 10 miles north of INTUIT DOME votes: 19
07/14/2026 - 02:28 PM
FWIW, I voted for "major concern" but that was only because there aren't
options that fit where I stand on this. I'm more in the "I can't vote because I
need to see what documentation is out there" or "I'm less concerned
about losing draft picks because the Clippers make good 2nd round picks and Ballmer
is always willing to pay more for top talent therefore losing draft picks aren't as
big a doomsday thing as it would be for a smaller market"
FWIW, I voted for "major concern" but that was only because there aren't
options that fit where I stand on this. I'm more in the "I can't vote because I
need to see what documentation is out there" or "I'm less concerned
about losing draft picks because the Clippers make good 2nd round picks and Ballmer
is always willing to pay more for top talent therefore losing draft picks aren't as
big a doomsday thing as it would be for a smaller market"
I wouldn't be so cavalier about draft picks. Sure we have done well in the second
round, but imagine if all those years we didn't give up the picks for Paul George?
With this front office's ability to pick well, we would have had a much better team.
I'm sure that if the league does take picks, we can manage to field a decent team. But
those years without picks was miserable because we were essentially having to hope
that all the old guys would stay healthy to contend, and that was a losing battle for
us. If we would have kept picks and drafted well, it wouldn't have been so dire at the
end. I honestly hope we can come out of this without draft pick removal. I'm just
tired of seeing this front office have to go for stars in their twighlight like
Harden and Beal to make a last ditch effort.
Trueblood CNS MVP X1Posts: 2627Location: 10 miles north of INTUIT DOME Joined: 08/19/2009Age: 55 votes: 19
07/14/2026 - 06:58 PM
pageC4 wrote:
I wouldn't be so cavalier about draft picks. Sure we have done well in the second
round, but imagine if all those years we didn't give up the picks for Paul George?
With this front office's ability to pick well, we would have had a much better team.
I'm sure that if the league does take picks, we can manage to field a decent team. But
those years without picks was miserable because we were essentially having to hope
that all the old guys would stay healthy to contend, and that was a losing battle for
us. If we would have kept picks and drafted well, it would have been so dire at the end.
I honestly hope we can come out of this without draft pick removal. I'm just tired of
seeing this front office have to go for stars in their twighlight like Harden and
Beal to make a last ditch effort.
This is true. I guess my problem with the PG thing is that the picks went to a conference
rival and it wound up gifting them a title
In this situation, nobody gets the picks. I guess the player's union will be upset
since that's one less guaranteed first round contract but at least we aren't
gifting another title
As for Ballmer, I just harken to what's going on in Denver right now. If the Clips had
Peyton Watson's bird rights, his contract would've already been a done deal.
Ballmer will wind up keeping the YKN's, Baba Miller's, Kobe Sander's and Jordan
Miller's of the world who otherwise would've been let go had we or if we keep the draft
picks
This is true. I guess my problem with the PG thing is that the picks went to a
conference rival and it wound up gifting them a title
In this situation, nobody gets the picks. I guess the player's union will be upset
since that's one less guaranteed first round contract but at least we aren't
gifting another title
As for Ballmer, I just harken to what's going on in Denver right now. If the Clips had
Peyton Watson's bird rights, his contract would've already been a done deal.
Ballmer will wind up keeping the YKN's, Baba Miller's, Kobe Sander's and Jordan
Miller's of the world who otherwise would've been let go had we or if we keep the draft
picks
In some respect, I see how losing the picks in this situation doesn't seem that bad at
first. But remember that there is a void in the first round if we aren't picking.
Whatever player we might have drafted will cause a domino effect that would send one
player down into the second round that probably wouldn't be there normally. Some
team will get that player, so I think we end up gifting someone a better draft pick
somewhere down the line. NBa opening another investigation is just crazy. They
probably don't have, as you say, enough evidence to come down with a guilty verdict.
I think Ballmer and Kawhi are clearly guilty, but as you said it's what you can prove,
and perhaps they don't have a strong case to punish the Clippers...yet. This second
investigation kind of shows what they found so far is weak.
toohipcliptoslip CNS MVP X2Posts: 9527votes: 71
07/14/2026 - 07:15 PM
Some people cannot play it straight. It is their nature to cheat. Many businessmen maybe
Bill Gates and politicians like Clinton and Trump are sociopathic/psychopathic
and will slime when they get the chance. Dogs bark Ballmer slimes?
pageC4 CNS MVP X2Posts: 9838votes: 56
07/14/2026 - 08:53 PM
toohipcliptoslip wrote:
Some people cannot play it straight. It is their nature to cheat. Many businessmen
maybe Bill Gates and politicians like Clinton and Trump are
sociopathic/psychopathic and will slime when they get the chance. Dogs bark
Ballmer slimes?
Yeah, there is a cut throat or borderline illegal method to many of these
billionaires or politicians. You don't get to that level by being nice. I don't know
if you've seen the founder, a movie about Ray Crock and the McDonald's brothers? I
think that sort of thing is common in those circles. You can even look at the Facebook
owner and his shady ousting of other folks that helped in the early stages of the
company.
david Site AdminPosts: 27632Joined: 04/12/2001votes: 59
07/14/2026 - 10:06 PM
Commissioner Silver has stated that the league expects the investigation to conclude by the end
of the summer. He also clarified that the current delay in the transaction was a
mutual decision between the Clippers and the Raptors.