More Important Acquisition? Glen Davis or Danny Granger

Clippers Forum » Clippers News & General Discussions
Poll
More Important Acquisition?
Danny Granger
26%
[9]
Glen Davis
73%
[25]
Total Votes: 34
Both are HUGE signings obviously , but which one will have more of an impact to this team. Let's say hypothetically Granger and Davis are both healthy and contribute well to this team. Which one....

I suggest we wait and see till after the season ends. But for those who like to jump the gun and play these games, I hope they both play great and it's a tie. Very Happy

Big Baby = a NEED in the roster. Granger is more of an asset he's good to have, but not a necessity.

Have to say Glen because we needed a big body big. His ability to play both big spots is a bonus that we needed all season.

Rondo.

I voted Big Baby,we need bulk and did we get some bulk.

When did we sign Rondo!???

Davis helps with rebounding and some offense and defense (but as a backup), I think Granger in the starting line-up will be more important come playoff's.

I don't think we can tell who's more important because they both address different needs/holes... Personally, I love both signings. Yellow_Flash_Colorz_PDT_08 Mr. Green

Granger, we been thirsty for this sort of wing player for a long time

^^^^^ not just thirsty.. parched...

If both "Healthy" no doubt Granger from 3 years ago

is one of the most unstoppable offensive players

in the league and an allstar.

But I'll tell you what, I was at the game in houston

and Big Baby got a huge standing ovation when he

came into the game. I sense clippernation really

understood how decimated we were at PF and C.

With that said I never realized how massive Big Baby is.

My God in real life he looks like a moving condominium on the

court.

Mullins and Jamison turns into Davis and Granger... i mean.. come the F*ck on!!!!!

Danny Granger "will" be in that starting lineup :nbaTV GameTime lol

this is ridiculous that we're even having this discussion. ridiculous in a very good way..

For the time being it has to be Glen Davis because we absolutely had no back up bigs.. could change depending on their play later in the season but for now i feel we filled the biggest need..

ClipperPostman wrote:
If both "Healthy" no doubt Granger from 3 years ago

is one of the most unstoppable offensive players

in the league and an allstar.

But I'll tell you what, I was at the game in houston

and Big Baby got a huge standing ovation when he

came into the game. I sense clippernation really

understood how decimated we were at PF and C.

With that said I never realized how massive Big Baby is.

My God in real life he looks like a moving condominium on the

court.

The dude is 11 pounds from being 300. That Is Massive in the NBA almost immovable.

I think Big Baby was a great get.He does all the things we needed a big off the bench to do.He can rebound,defend,and has a solid offensive game.If we can get Granger to fit in defensively and hit some spot up shots then he is a great fit.But as of right now he is defiantly a big x factor.We just don't know what he can give us at this point of his career and the season.We don't have a lot of time to get him adjusted so we got to hope he is healthy and a fast learner.

Davis or someone like him was pretty much a necessity, Granger is a luxury that we didn't necessarily need and but it would great if he works and clearly has more upside of the two.

It looks like every one said the same thing. Davis filled a need and Granger filled a luxury/want - but both still significantly important.

Wow, stacked roster. How many Clips are rentals likely to go get paid more by other teams this summer? Collison, Davis, Granger, Hedo seem that way to me.

Clips will try to dump Dudley and Green on anybody, good luck with Dudley dump.

Would especially like to see clip keep Collison and Davis for sure but probably far fetched.

kdawg wrote:
Wow, stacked roster. How many Clips are rentals likely to go get paid more by other teams this summer? Collison, Davis, Granger, Hedo seem that way to me.

Clips will try to dump Dudley and Green on anybody, good luck with Dudley dump.

Would especially like to see clip keep Collison and Davis for sure but probably far fetched.

Well we got rid of Mullens so it is now easier to believe we can get rid of Dudley.

kdawg wrote:
Wow, stacked roster. How many Clips are rentals likely to go get paid more by other teams this summer? Collison, Davis, Granger, Hedo seem that way to me.

Clips will try to dump Dudley and Green on anybody, good luck with Dudley dump.

Would especially like to see clip keep Collison and Davis for sure but probably far fetched.

Dudley's contract is very movable. If Joe Johnson and Rudy Gay can get traded so can Duds.

Hard to truly say who it will be, but the reality is that this team needed an adequate third big far more than it needed anything else this season

Heediot wrote:
Dudley's contract is very movable. If Joe Johnson and Rudy Gay can get traded so can Duds.
Also teams prbobably don't think he forgot to play basketball after one below average season. Of course they will try and low ball, so you can't expect decent value, but not really a difficult contract to move. An easy idea is a team with a good cap situation that wants to add a backup SF, they could trade a 2nd round pick for him.

I love how people think Dudley is completely cooked after half an injury plagued slumping season, but that Danny Granger who is older and had basically the same injury but has been struggling for a year and half, is ready to completely bounce back any day now. Even more so when Dudley is clearly moving better than he was at the beginning of the season and his rebound rate is about 3 times higher in February than it was in November.

Register Now
You are an anonymous user