david Site AdminPosts: 27632Joined: 04/12/2001votes: 59
07/06/2026 - 03:50 PM
Speculation is swirling regarding whether the Clippers might pursue a sign-and-trade deal for
Peyton Watson. While he would bring defensive energy and youth to the roster, the
cost of a sign-and-trade can often be prohibitive. Given the current roster
construction, is he the type of player the front office should be targeting to push
the team over the top?
pageC4 CNS MVP X2Posts: 9838votes: 56
07/06/2026 - 04:01 PM
Trueblood wrote:
If they renounce the rights to Benedict Mathurin, they would have roughly $15
million plus their room exception of $9 million
I think the Lakers are considering him as well.
pageC4 CNS MVP X2Posts: 9838votes: 56
07/06/2026 - 07:29 PM
He plays the same position as Mathurin, so we might be able to do a direct swap for the
two. However, one thing that might make this difficult is that Watson is rumored to
be asking for $25 million a year.
pageC4 CNS MVP X2Posts: 9838votes: 56
07/06/2026 - 07:31 PM
I like his size. At 6'8", he has the ideal height to make him very valuable. He
plays the same position as Mathurin (SF and SG), so we might be able to do a direct swap
for the two. However, one thing that might make this difficult is that Watson is
rumored to be asking for $25 million a year. This is why I wasn't happy with the
Clippers signing Brook Lopez. We could have used that $9 million.
pageC4 CNS MVP X2Posts: 9838votes: 56
07/08/2026 - 10:15 PM
It looks like Denver could get hit with a $117 million repeater tax if they resign
Watson at the projected $25 million per year Watson is rumored to be asking for, and
this is considering if they waive Valanciunis. Denver might be at a slight
disadvantage here. We don't need to offer them an absurd package, as we can always
call their bluff, let them resign Watson, and go over the cap. Good news for
us.
Trueblood CNS MVP X1Posts: 2627Location: 10 miles north of INTUIT DOME Joined: 08/19/2009Age: 55 votes: 19
07/09/2026 - 01:07 PM
pageC4 wrote:
It looks like Denver could get hit with a $117 million repeater tax if they resign
Watson at the projected $25 million per year Watson is rumored to be asking for, and
this is considering if they waive Valanciunis. Denver might be at a slight
disadvantage here. We don't need to offer them an absurd package, as we can always
call their bluff, let them resign Watson, and go over the cap. Good news for us.
I've thought about that as well but the Kroenke family is pretty wealthy. They are the
one's who built everything across the street from ID on the Sofi lot. Like I said
earlier in this thread or another thread, small and medium sized markets should
never let their late 1st and 2nd round picks go for pennies on the dollar or walk
altogether. I'm not telling people how to run their business or spend their money
but when you consider that Cam Johnson and his $23 million are off the books in a year,
you may want to consider sacrificing for one year and then running it
back
I've thought about that as well but the Kroenke family is pretty wealthy. They are
the one's who built everything across the street from ID on the Sofi lot. Like I said
earlier in this thread or another thread, small and medium sized markets should
never let their late 1st and 2nd round picks go for pennies on the dollar or walk
altogether. I'm not telling people how to run their business or spend their money
but when you consider that Cam Johnson and his $23 million are off the books in a year,
you may want to consider sacrificing for one year and then running it back
Yeah, there are always some very wealthy people. I agree with your take on small
markets. I think the draft is essentially their best way to build. When they let
their players go, it essentially relegates them to a farm system for the big market
teams like the Lakers. If I were any GM, I would be keeping up with Oklahoma City
daily. They have an obscene amount of draft picks, but they cannot realistically
keep them all. There's going to be some really good role players being let go,
especially now that Chet, Shai, and Lu Dort are off their rookie contracts. To boot,
Alex Caruso and Isaiah Hartenstein are each on a $19 mill and $28 mill contract. This
isn't exactly feasible for much longer. I have a feeling that they will be doing what
they always do pretty soon and let some of these guys walk. Out of principle, I'd love
to poach as many players from them as possible. I still want a small payback for the
fleecing in that PG trade.
Trueblood CNS MVP X1Posts: 2627Location: 10 miles north of INTUIT DOME Joined: 08/19/2009Age: 55 votes: 19
07/09/2026 - 04:50 PM
pageC4 wrote:
Yeah, there are always some very wealthy people. I agree with your take on small
markets. I think the draft is essentially their best way to build. When they let
their players go, it essentially relegates them to a farm system for the big market
teams like the Lakers. If I were any GM, I would be keeping up with Oklahoma City
daily. They have an obscene amount of draft picks, but they cannot realistically
keep them all. There's going to be some really good role players being let go,
especially now that Chet, Shai, and Lu Dort are off their rookie contracts. To boot,
Alex Caruso and Isaiah Hartenstein are each on a $19 mill and $28 mill contract. This
isn't exactly feasible for much longer. I have a feeling that they will be doing what
they always do pretty soon and let some of these guys walk. Out of principle, I'd love
to poach as many players from them as possible. I still want a small payback for the
fleecing in that PG trade.
True although I don't know why Detroit and Atlanta decided to help arguably the best team
in the league in OKC. Detroit has nothing but wings and shooters but for some reason,
decided that they needed to add Isaiah Joe to the roster. Now they not only have a
logjam at his position but OKC gets out from under the $9 million they owed him
despite him being a 3rd stringer which in turn allowed them to keep Dort and
Hartenstein
Which brings us to Atlanta. Basically the same thing. No reason to bring in Wiggins when
you have Risacher, Kispert and Hield as backups already. If the league and it's
teams want to keep the parity train going, you can't help the teams on
top
True although I don't know why Detroit and Atlanta decided to help arguably the best
team in the league in OKC. Detroit has nothing but wings and shooters but for some
reason, decided that they needed to add Isaiah Joe to the roster. Now they not only
have a logjam at his position but OKC gets out from under the $9 million they owed him
despite him being a 3rd stringer which in turn allowed them to keep Dort and
Hartenstein
Which brings us to Atlanta. Basically the same thing. No reason to bring in Wiggins when
you have Risacher, Kispert and Hield as backups already. If the league and it's
teams want to keep the parity train going, you can't help the teams on top
True, some teams don't see the overall picture. I remember when the Memphis
Grizzlies traded Pau Gasol to the Lakers. My first thought was, "Why do you
want to gift wrap a championship to them?" The same with the Luca trade. I like
how San Antonio refuses to trade with certain teams. When Kawhi became available
for trade, the Spurs didn't even take the Lakers' calls, which pissed them
off.
LuvMeSumMEE Clipper All-StarPosts: 2003Location: The 805 votes: 19
07/09/2026 - 06:59 PM
I've been waiting since the 2022 Draft to get Peyton Watson. We didn't have a pick til the
middle of the 2nd round...
We have to strike on this thing and bring PWat back home.
toohipcliptoslip CNS MVP X2Posts: 9527votes: 71
07/09/2026 - 08:26 PM
To repeat my b*tch. Small market teams should have a huge salary cap