Chris Paul is NOT Lebron James or Kevin Durant

Chris Paul is NOT Lebron or Durant

We're not getting a Lebron or Durant, and we aren't moving to the East where we get an easier road to success. The quicker people realize that, the sooner they will at the least start appreciating the stars that we do have. That's really all their is to it. The Clippers were arguably a top 4 team in the league: Miami, SA, OKC, LAC, and they lost to one of the other top 4 teams. We have glaring faults we all knew about (SF position, backup C) that aren't related to our PG getting a sucky and stupid turnover when he averaged 23/4/12 on .611 TS%, whose presence on the floor always had the team playing well and who was our best player in the series.

CP's playoff production is above his regular season production, he was more aggressive, he took care of the ball as much as you can, he scored even more efficiently and at a higher rate, and that's all we can ask for. He isn't Lebron, he isn't Durant, so expecting him to be is futile as there are only two of those in the league. In the series, Paul evened out Westbrook, he scored about 5 points less a game, had the same scoring efficiency, got more assists, and had about 10 less turnovers (probably the biggest thing and caused the Clippers as a team to commit 5.5% less turnovers, about 5 less a game). Their production and impact basically cancelled out.

Chris Paul was by all measures a positive

Just think of all the games, when he came on / was on the court, whether Westbrook was blowing by him or he wasn't trying to attack enough by some people's standards, we played well and were better. That's how you know a player is high impact. Not only did our perception say this, the numbers back it up. The best way to see that something is really true is with multiple evidences. I believe the Clippers were (+) in the series when he was on the court. He screwed up in game 5 and we were still +11 when he was on the court. We won game 4 by 2 and he was +12, we lost game 3 and he was +4, we lost game 2 by 11 and he was only (-4)

Game 1 (+26) - 17 pt win

Game 2 (-4) - 11 pt loss

Game 3 (+4) - 2 pt loss

Game 4 (+12) - 2 pt win

Game 5 (+11) - 1 pt loss

Game 6 (-4) - 6 pt loss

A guy is only (-) in 2/6 games, and just (-4) in each and even still net positive for the team in those games. If we take out the blowout, he was +19 on the series while on the court. With the blowout, it is +36.

That's one set of stars, moving on to the next. Durant outproduced Blake by a decent margin, both in volume and efficiency, but we were expecting that I'd hope. He even matched him on the glass per minute, and that is one thing we keep wondering about Blake in the post season, his rebounding. Durant 33/10/5/4.0 tov./610 TS%, Blake 24/9/4/2.2 tov/.540 TS%. So among the 4 stars, we evened out at PG, but were in a deficit with the forwards, so we couldn't match their star production, which means our role players have to make it up.

Role / Complimentary Players

If we want to find places to blame, well here's the efficiency of of complimentary guys compared to OKC's:

Clippers

Jamal: 14.2 ppg / 35.3% FG / 29.4% 3PT / .460 TS% / 95 Ortg

Redick: 12.2 ppg / 45.9% FG / 41.7% 3PT / .570 TS% / 114 Ortg

Barnes: 10.0 ppg / 39.0% FG / 31.4% 3PT / .487 TS% / 97 Ortg

Collison: 7.2 ppg / 40.0% FG / 00.0% 3PT / .461 TS% / 101 Ortg

Jordan: 6.9 ppg / 69.2% FG / 4/19 FT / .582 TS% / 100 Ortg

Thunder

Ibaka: 11.3 ppg / 63.8% FG / 40.0% 3PT / .673 TS% / 115 Ortg

Jackson: 9.0 ppg / 42.9% FG / 33.3% 3PT / .541 TS% / 102 Ortg

Thabo: 6.2 ppg / 61.5% FG / 30.8% 3PT / .688 TS% / 131 Ortg

Adams: 5.0 ppg / 70% FG / .650 TS% / 139 Ortg

We are glossing over the reality that despite his vastly inferior scoring skills, Ibaka was a better offensive player than Jamal this series. A LOT better. Jamal had a 30.0% usage while on the floor, Ibaka had half of that with 15.2%. Our role players really didn't make up the deficit between Blake and Durant, Chris Paul not turning the ball over and being the main cog in limiting TEAM turnovers ended up being the main reason were were ahead or close in games. But not turning it over has its limits as we saw because we still needed guys that weren't Paul and Blake to make shots at a high rate (not 7/22 kind of making shots), and they didn't.

Skill vs Actual Impact

If the extra possessions Jamal used in comparison to Ibaka are spread to a guy with similar efficiency to Ibaka, and CP and Blake increase their usage to make up for it, they might be less efficient individually (or might not), but they would still beat Jamal's efficiency on those possessions, and combined with the super efficiency of this more contained role player, it is a positive for the team offensively. What kind of role player could this be? Well if you had Danny Green off the bench averaging 9-10 ppg on .600+ TS% in a more contained role, you actually net being fairly better on offense this previous series than with a superior individual offensive player in Crawford taking and missing a lot of shots, not to mention that you get extra defense too. That one extra made three or whatever means maybe you're up 16 or 17 instead in game 5, it means maybe you're closer in game 6, and in striking distance, etc. Yea, those little things make a difference when you're matching up similar level teams.

So yes, despite the ability to create, it hurts the team in the end when a complimentary player / scorer shoots a lot and misses a lot because those possessions could be used better. Missing a lot is always bad, but there are things that can at least alleviate it. 1) High level playmaking 2) Getting to the basket a lot and causing the defense to shift which again opens up playmaking with drive and kick, and might increase chances for offensive rebounds at the least. Sadly, Jamal tends to forget about playmaking and Jamal isolates a lot but shoots from the perimeter, so he doesn't even have the extras that while they don't make it okay, can at least soften the blow. Chris Paul and Blake Griffin iso ball even against a good defense can generally still get a team to produce average offense. Jamal Crawford iso ball doesn't produce the same results part of it is because those guys also consistently create and don't just look to score, but of course because they are high level stars / superstars, and Jamal is still just a role playing scorer and just below All-Star level at his best.

We were close in this series because we turned the ball over less. 5 less turnovers a game meant about 5-6 more PPG for us. Paul was the reason we didn't turn the ball over so much. OKC out shot us from the field in 4/6 games. The two they didn't were game 1 and game 5 even though we lost that one. Even in our game 4 win, they out-shot us, but we had 7 less turnovers and 6 more offensive rebounds, so we extended 6 more possessions and had an extra 7, and we won by just 2 points because they shot 5% better from the field and 7% better from the line. Paul's ability to be on the ball so much and not turn the ball over as well as Blake limiting his turnovers (and Jamal despite his horrific shooting) kept us in games and kept us in the series, but we were massively out-shot from game 2-5.

It is good to make shots, duh (including FT's)

Game 2

OKC: .552 eFG% / 72.7% FT (16/22) / 16 TOV

LAC: .500 eFG% / 78.3% FT (18/23) / 14 TOV

Diff: -5.2 eFG% / +5.6 FT% / +2 FTM / -2 TOV

-this game we were only +2 in turnovers and got killed on the offensive glass (35.7% to 19.6%), so +2 turnovers and 5% FT isn't going to make up being out-shot by 5.2% and -6 on the offensive glass.

Game 3

OKC: .595 eFG% / 85.7% FT (24/28) / 14 TOV

LAC: .489 eFG% / 84.0% FT (21/25) / 6 TOV

Diff: -10.6 eFG% / -1.7 FT% / -3 FTM / -8 TOV

Game 4

OKC: .487 eFG% / 76.5% FT (26/34) / 16 TOV

LAC: .435 eFG% / 69.0% FT (20/29) / 9 TOV

Diff: -5.2 eFG% / -7.5% FT / -6 FTM / -7 TOV

Game 5

OKC: .474 eFG% / 88.9% FT (32/36) / 12 TOV

LAC: .500 eFG% / 80.0% FT (16/20) / 16 TOV

Diff: +2.6 eFG% / -8.9% FT / -16 FTM / +4 TOV

Game 6

OKC: .521 eFG% / 87.9% FT (29/33) / 15 TOV

LAC: .453 eFG% / 60.0% FT (12/20) / 9 TOV

Diff: -6.8% eFG% / -27.9% FT / -17 FTM / -6 TOV

OKC had 5 players who played significant minutes with a TS% over .600 (Durant, Westbrook, Ibaka, Thabo, Adams), Clippers had Paul and Davis. We were down 5.2% eFG% or more in 4/5 games. The difference between 40% FG and 45% FG, and I'll admit, the FT difference in games 5 and 6 is a bit wild, and we progressively shot worse and less at the FT line, but it was those 8, 7 and 6 less turnovers keeping us in games.

....and there ladies and gentlemen is why it is a TEAM sport. If you're so focused on trying to find out what the stars did or didn't do (and sometimes they are at the deficit, but not always), you'll miss all the little things that in a tightly contested series will make the difference between a win and a loss. We can talk about whether they deserved their FT's, blah, blah, but if we're talking about Paul, he scored a lot and efficiently, he created, and he limited his and the teams turnovers except for the little stretch. Now, if the role players don't make OPEN shots, cause if they weren't getting open then it is the offenses fault, but open shots, then well what are you going to do?

We had two options to give us the edge, not to crawl away with victories. 1) Blake matches Durant's offensive production in terms of volume and efficiency which just isn't fair, not just because Durant is better, but even considering who is defending each of them and 2) Our role players outplay their role players. Blake did fairly well, but he wasn't close to Durant's production, and our role players lost the battle of efficient role play (and defense), so we were living on one advantage the whole series and that was "Chris Paul doesn't turn the ball over much and doesn't let his teams turn the ball over a lot". That's not the best advantage to live or die on.

Great post Agent- thought it deserved its own thread as a new blog entry. Your argument backed up with statistics clearly shows that Chris Paul certainly cannot be the culprit of the Clippers vs Thunder series, but rather the problem is mainly with the below par performances by the supporting cast. Repped!

Problem is CP Stans put him in the same category as LJ and KD

You're right that CP3 isn't LeBron or Durant.... those guys have actually been past the second round of the playoffs. CP3 is more of a T-Mac.

At this point, we're just beating the horse to death. He made his mistakes, some of the supporting cast played below average etc. etc.

It IS a great post.

Unfortunately, the mob has to shake their pitchforks at somebody, however simplistic and misplaced their fury may be.

Jquick32 you really don't know when to shut up do you all I get ever ever see you do is whine a bitch about how bad this team does and your so damn negative. CP3 and T-Mac are not the same player T-Mac was a scorer and C3 is a leader a pass first PG it's annoying how negative you are and how much your troll this team the players.

I am sort of shocked no one was calling for Docs head on a stick. He didn't take us further then VDN,maybe it's his fault.

Or maybe it is my fault. I forgot to wear my black socks and I forgot to take my shot of MAker's MArk in my car before I went in.

Wait you're telling me a 6' PG does not have the same influence on the game as two players over 6'8''. Also I don't remember anyone saying Cp3 is better than Lebron or Durant.

Jquick32 you really don't know when to shut up do you all I get ever ever see you do is whine a bitch about how bad this team does and your so damn negative. CP3 and T-Mac are not the same player T-Mac was a scorer and C3 is a leader a pass first PG it's annoying how negative you are and how much your troll this team the players.

Please refrain from personal attacks. It's fine to disagree but this goes into a personal attack when you say things like "you don't know when to shut up" and "all I ever see is you bitch and whine". You're entitled to your opinion, just please present it more respectfully.

Pretty sure if Lebron or KD was 5'11 they wouldn't be as effective as they are now. Just saying lol

I think Cp3 played arguably his best defensive series in the first round. I was amazed how well he controlled Curry by making him a passer instead of a scorer most of the series. Aside from one game, he did his job better than I have ever seen him play defense. That deserves credit. Enough to make him MVP or Co-MVP of that series in my eyes. Against OKC, he played well up until, late in game 5. There are no words to describe the blunder CP3 made. Yeas, maybe he took care of the ball most of the series but not when it counted. Maybe CP3 isn't LBJ or Durant but he was brought here to be our leader and Co-face of this franchise. He was brought here to help bring us a ring. He was paid to be our LBJ and Durant whether stats show that or not...The salary reflects what LBJ and Durant make.

I appreciate what CP3 has done for this team but I ain't forgetting what he did to ruin our chances to advance. That's what it boils down to. He looked defeated after that and it showed in game 6. If we can't count on our floor general in the most important time, then who can we count on? Our role players? While CP3 ain't LBJ or Durant, we sure are paying him like them.

you cant compare an apple to a banana

i don't know why Chris Paul gets a bad wrap, look at the past champions in the last 10 to 15 years they all had multiple all stars and numerous amount of players that contributed to the wins. You have to take in account that at 6 foot he can only do so much and Blake is finally starting to come in his own.outside of Chris Paul , Griffin and Jordan the rest of this team has been inconsistent. They would be hot for a few game and the complete opposite for a few games we are a few pieces away. Look at the teams that won in the past few years:

Heat had 3 stars in Lebron, Wade, and bosh

-with a supporting cast of veterans such as ray allen, shane battier and haslem and more

Mavericks won with a collection of multiple all stars pass their primes with a Dirk to anchor their offense and Chandler and Marion to anchor their defense

-with a sixth man in Jason terry

Lakers had kobe, gasol and bynum with on of the best coach

-with a supporting cast in odom, metta world peace

celtics had their big 3 kg, pierce, allen, and a rondo who came into his own at the right time

-had glue guys such as tony allen and james posey

Heck even the Spurs has 3 all stars in parker , duncan and ginobli

My point being although there were mistakes that can be called out about cp3 this year, all champions had an collection of talent to get it done , and to be honest how supporting cast was mediocre and to inconsistent, and our 3rd players in our alleged big 3 in deandre jordan is limited to rebounds and dunks. we need a players who can score or an consistent basis on the wing who isn't 6 foot.

Jquick32 you really don't know when to shut up do you all I get ever ever see you do is whine a bitch about how bad this team does and your so damn negative. CP3 and T-Mac are not the same player T-Mac was a scorer and C3 is a leader a pass first PG it's annoying how negative you are and how much your troll this team the players.

For real. JQuick is not a "real" fan in my eyes. Sometimes I wonder how this dude is still allowed to post on this board. He contributes nothing but negativity and bullsh*t.

For real. JQuick is not a "real" fan in my eyes. Sometimes I wonder how this dude is still allowed to post on this board. He contributes nothing but negativity and bullsh*t.

You've been given an official warning for this post. I've said it about 20 times, this attacking people as not being "real" fans WILL NOT be tolerated. It's about the most offensive thing you can do on a sports forum. Somebody with opposite views can be just as much of a fan as the next person. Please post more respectfully in the future. The way this forum has ALWAYS been... is we have a balance of more optimistic fans... and more skeptical fans. Neither way is "right", they are just different. If every fan on here was optimistic and thought everything around them was roses, this would be a boring forum.

CP3 is not Lebron or Durant, he's CP3. It's so obvious, he's his own man and legend.

You're right that CP3 isn't LeBron or Durant.... those guys have actually been past the second round of the playoffs. CP3 is more of a T-Mac.

On the Lakers LTB board, there were guys like you even in the title years. They were called Kobe haters. If the Lakers won, it was because of Shaq, Pau, Ariza. Metta, DFish, the ball boy, the guy who mops the wet spots, the cheerleaders -- anybody but Kobe. If we lost there was ONLY ONE culprit -- Kobe Bryant. He shot too much, he shot too little, he played too many minutes, not enough minutes, he missed a free throw in the first quarter. No matter what, he was to blame.

You are like that with CP3. Doesn't matter that the refs took away his victory. Or DJ missed a bunch of free throws. Jeez, if Danny Granger had made ONE SHOT IN A BLUE FRIGGIN' MOON, and shot even slightly better than Stevie Wonder, we would have won every game against OKC.

Chris' career is far from over. For the three years he has been here, he has put the Clippers in a position to win. That is all you can ask for a player in a TEAM game.

You've been given an official warning for this post. I've said it about 20 times, this attacking people as not being "real" fans WILL NOT be tolerated. It's about the most offensive thing you can do on a sports forum. Somebody with opposite views can be just as much of a fan as the next person. Please post more respectfully in the future. The way this forum has ALWAYS been... is we have a balance of more optimistic fans... and more skeptical fans. Neither way is "right", they are just different. If every fan on here was optimistic and thought everything around them was roses, this would be a boring forum.

What's so bad about saying that in "his eyes" he's not a real fan. Harmless but I guess your the boss. In my opinion you're the one who should lighten up a bit