AirGriffin wrote:
DJ is only defense. He is a one trick pony. What discussion is there? His
"stats" like his field goal percentage is a Total crock of sh*t because
all he does is dunk and catch lobs. How do you like stats then? How misleading is that
high of a field goal percentage? Much higher than Duncan's and Shaqs in a season of
their careers so can "stats" always give you the truth? Please this goes
to everyone lets all try to watch more basketball and use our own judgment instead of
always referring to stats. Stats also are formed through circumstances that are
not represented on the stat sheet.
Break down scoring possessions when the player creates his own shot if you want to get
advanced. DJ will probably rank last in the league lol. Melo just won scoring title
not that long ago while DJ can't even win DPOY if you want to talk stats.
While I don't agree with you on Carmelo, you do bring up some very good points about
stats. I think you bring up some very valid points, which is the lack of context with
stats. For years DJ was really touted for that high FG percentage, but as you
correctly stated he rarely takes shots other than dunks and lobs. If those are your
only ways of making points those percentages are going to be huge.
Also, his rebounding numbers are greatly influenced with the fact that Blake has
essentially vacated much of the paint. Blake now positions himself further away in
order to take mid-rage shots, so his opportunities for the rebound have
diminished.
I am in a masters program at Cal State Fullerton, and we read, analyze and use stats all
the time. The thing that all great researchers do is divulge any potential problems
or concerns with their findings. For example, a researchers analysis of DJ's
ability would be: DJ has the highest FG% in the league, but caution must be taken when
making claims about DJ's abilities since the majority of his plays were off of dunks
and lobs. When examining his shots from beyond XX feet it is found that he ranks XX in
the league in field goal percentage..behind players like XX, XX, and XX. When
controlling for distance from the rim we found that he ranks XX in the league, not
first. This disclaimer lets you know that all things considered variables must be
similar across test subjects or else numbers can be misleading.
Unfortunately, in forums we don't have this same level of honesty or accountability. Rather people
post up a link to one of the popular stat sites and what is represented on a matrix is
supposed to thwart everything. If the same criteria would be used in scientific
research the findings would be quickly discredited.
Great job Airgriffin