If this means we get rid of Hawes then I say absolutely pull the
trigger.
Stephenson has a team option after next season so it's not going to hurt us if he has another bad
season unlike Hawes.
Do you guys like this trade?
clips15deep Clipper StarterPosts: 392votes: 2
06/15/2015 - 05:16 PM
Love this idea. We obviously are having a tough time signing talent with our limited
flexibility and I have never seen a better buy-low opportunity for a young and
dynamic former all-star.
journeyman CNS MVP X1Posts: 3852Location: Los Angelesvotes: 40
06/15/2015 - 05:17 PM
Stephenson is a bad egg and I hope we do not sign this inefficient headcase.
CapsNClips CNS MVP X2Posts: 5408votes: 61
06/15/2015 - 05:25 PM
journeyman wrote:
Stephenson is a bad egg and I hope we do not sign this inefficient headcase.
J.R. Smith and Draymond Green are "bad eggs" and they're in the
finals.
We haven't ever made it to the WCF's, we aren't good enough to be picky about the players
attitudes that we want.
journeyman CNS MVP X1Posts: 3852Location: Los Angelesvotes: 40
06/15/2015 - 05:32 PM
CapsNClips wrote:
J.R. Smith and Draymond Green are "bad eggs" and they're in the
finals.
We haven't ever made it to the WCF's, we aren't good enough to be picky about the players
attitudes that we want.
Lance Stephenson is not taking anyone to the finals.
journeyman CNS MVP X1Posts: 3852Location: Los Angelesvotes: 40
06/15/2015 - 05:34 PM
CapsNClips wrote:
J.R. Smith and Draymond Green are "bad eggs" and they're in the
finals.
We haven't ever made it to the WCF's, we aren't good enough to be picky about the players
attitudes that we want.
In fact, Draymond Green isn't a bad egg at all. I'd love to have him on this
team.
-clippernation- Clipper 6th ManPosts: 229votes: 1
06/15/2015 - 05:37 PM
I'm for the trade, as long as we trade Crawford too. Would rather it be Hawes and Crawford
instead of Barnes.
CapsNClips CNS MVP X2Posts: 5408votes: 61
06/15/2015 - 05:37 PM
journeyman wrote:
Lance Stephenson is not taking anyone to the finals.
He almost did his last two seasons with Indiana, but okay.
JahvonTheClip CNS MVP X1Posts: 4231votes: 9
06/15/2015 - 05:39 PM
Lance stephenson is a better defender and rebounder than hawes and is 6 inches shorter
lol...That should say something
Hawes is wack and will never be a good playoff starter we desperately need a small forward
who is young and can play both ends make this happen clippers.
jarca CNS MVP ChampionPosts: 15671votes: 70
06/15/2015 - 05:41 PM
We're only losing Barnes and Hawes so I am fine with this trade. The question is do
Charlotte really want Stephenson gone that they'll accept our
trash?
CapsNClips CNS MVP X2Posts: 5408votes: 61
06/15/2015 - 05:44 PM
jarca wrote:
We're only losing Barnes and Hawes so I am fine with this trade. The question is do
Charlotte really want Stephenson gone a
I'm for the trade, as long as we trade Crawford too. Would rather it be Hawes and
Crawford instead of Barnes.
I don't mind trading barnes because we prob gonna sign a starting 3 with the mini mid
level and move redick to the bench and move crawford in a later deal for a back up big to
replace spencer. This could work out great
CapsNClips CNS MVP X2Posts: 5408votes: 61
06/15/2015 - 05:45 PM
journeyman wrote:
In fact, Draymond Green isn't a bad egg at all. I'd love to have him on this team.
I'd love Draymond Green also because he's incredible. That doesn't mean he isn't a
goon.
2014-15 Draymond is the PF version of 2013-14 Lance.
Sounds like a good trade to me, it gets rid of Hawes and that awful contract. If Stevenson
doesn't work out decline the team option and that's more money next years free
agents.
Fingers crossed
dom1 Clipper 6th ManPosts: 209votes: 2
06/15/2015 - 05:55 PM
Lance can very well start at the 3 the more i think about it and we can just sign a back up 3 to
replace barnes and a back big with the mini mid and that will leave redick in the
starting lineup. Stevenson rebs really well for his size. If he can bring defense
and rebounding anything on the offensive end will be a plus and upgrade over matt and
hawes together
I think THIS bad of a 3 point shooting year was an anomaly. I think he can get it to low
30's this year with FAR more good shots coming from CP3/Griffin. I freaking LOVE
this trade because it's low ish risk, VERY high reward potentially. If we get Pacers
Stephenson who bounces back next to CP3/Griffin and under Doc... this guy is a near
all star caliber player and we aren't giving up much. Barnes is a perennial playoff
no show and Hawes isn't a good fit. Lance is still young and if he returns to anything
near Pacers form his contract will be a bargain in 2 years when cap rises. These are
the kind of gambles Doc has failed on that teams like the Rockets have taken chances
on.
journeyman CNS MVP X1Posts: 3852Location: Los Angelesvotes: 40
06/15/2015 - 05:58 PM
CapsNClips wrote:
I'd love Draymond Green also because he's incredible. That doesn't mean he isn't a
goon.
2014-15 Draymond is the PF version of 2013-14 Lance.
I'd rather stick Draymond at the SF than Lance.
clipfan63 CNS MVP X1Posts: 3132votes: 13
06/15/2015 - 05:58 PM
-clippernation- wrote:
I'm for the trade, as long as we trade Crawford too. Would rather it be Hawes and
Crawford instead of Barnes.
Yeah, would rather it be Crawford and Hawes too, but if we actually can unload Hawes
and get anything back at all it's probably a good move.
TheDude CNS MVP X1Posts: 3226votes: 47
06/15/2015 - 05:59 PM
I think this is the obvious off season move for us. He hates it there, they hate him.
It's one of the only good players out there which we can trade for with some bit of
leverage in the deal. That said, I doubt Doc will be able to pull off a one-sided trade
based on his track record but if he can take advantage of anybody its
MJ.
hawes/jamal for LS/biyombo seems fair.
journeyman CNS MVP X1Posts: 3852Location: Los Angelesvotes: 40
06/15/2015 - 05:59 PM
This trade would make a lot more sense if it were Crawford being shipped instead of
Barnes. Stephenson would be ideal as ball-handling guard off the bench, not
undersized starting small forward.
CapsNClips CNS MVP X2Posts: 5408votes: 61
06/15/2015 - 06:00 PM
journeyman wrote:
I'd rather stick Draymond at the SF than Lance.
Obviously because Draymond Green is one of the best SF's in the league when playing that
position. I'm not comparing Green's and Stephenson's ability. I'm comparing
their personalities, which are almost the same.
Green is just as much of a jackass as Stephenson believe it or not.
itsLuigi Clipper All-StarPosts: 1313votes: 4
06/15/2015 - 06:05 PM
I think if Barnes is getting then we'll probably start fresh with the small forward
position. I wouldn't be surprised if Paul Peirce and Doc have been having
conversations
itsLuigi Clipper All-StarPosts: 1313votes: 4
06/15/2015 - 06:06 PM
I wouldn't mind adding Crawford or Wilcox if they add Roberts.
cleepers CNS MVP X3Posts: 11039votes: 157
06/15/2015 - 06:08 PM
I think the only reason the Clips' FO would be 'deliberating' is because they're
looking to trade Jamal, too. Can't have that much money and roster-spots tied up in
2-guards... JJ, Jamal, Stephenson, Wilcox - even Rivers is a combo-guard to
me.
If we can get a serviceable 3rd big for Jamal, then I'd be jumping at this
trade.
dom1 Clipper 6th ManPosts: 209votes: 2
06/15/2015 - 06:10 PM
journeyman wrote:
This trade would make a lot more sense if it were Crawford being shipped instead of
Barnes. Stephenson would be ideal as ball-handling guard off the bench, not
undersized starting small forward.
They have plenty of guards tho. That Is why it was no issue benching lance when he was
playing poorly. They have Henderson, taylor, and they likej hairston too. With
jamal that is over kill. They need a back up big. Al jeff always banged up, zeller and
vonleah too raw and bismack a free agent. Barnes behind michael kid g makes sense.
Lets use crawford in a separate deal to get a good back up big. Use mini on a gerald
green type who can replace crawford and actually play some 3 without hurting
us
journeyman CNS MVP X1Posts: 3852Location: Los Angelesvotes: 40
06/15/2015 - 06:12 PM
itsLuigi wrote:
I think if Barnes is getting then we'll probably start fresh with the small forward
position. I wouldn't be surprised if Paul Peirce and Doc have been having
conversations
If that's the case, the trade makes a lot more sense.
I think THIS bad of a 3 point shooting year was an anomaly. I think he can get it to low
30's this year with FAR more good shots coming from CP3/Griffin. I freaking LOVE
this trade because it's low ish risk, VERY high reward potentially. If we get Pacers
Stephenson who bounces back next to CP3/Griffin and under Doc... this guy is a near
all star caliber player and we aren't giving up much. Barnes is a perennial playoff
no show and Hawes isn't a good fit. Lance is still young and if he returns to anything
near Pacers form his contract will be a bargain in 2 years when cap rises. These are
the kind of gambles Doc has failed on that teams like the Rockets have taken chances
on.
I am not a fan of Stephenson at all and think he is a head case but if that is all we are
giving up it is definitely worth a look. I say pull the trigger and hope Stephenson
has a bounce back year.
Maybe we can dump Crawford too for a decent player. I can see MJ going for it we all know he
isn't a good evaluator of talent heh.
-clippernation- Clipper 6th ManPosts: 229votes: 1
06/15/2015 - 06:14 PM
Start Pierce and have Lance come off the bench with the sixth man role.
Agent0 CNS MVP X3Posts: 12036votes: 105
06/15/2015 - 06:15 PM
CapsNClips wrote:
J.R. Smith and Draymond Green are "bad eggs" and they're in the
finals.
We haven't ever made it to the WCF's, we aren't good enough to be picky about the players
attitudes that we want.
Draymond Green? The guy has had no issues with his teams in his basketball playing
career.
Don't care much for Stephenson, but I guess the FO has put themselves in a situation where
they have to start making gambles now. For Hawes and Barnes though, I'm fine with it.
If you get Stephenson you have to get rid of Crawford also, and I'd prefer Stephenson
as a 6th man. Hawes just does not fit what the team runs on defense and isn't good
enough on offense to make that up, even when he's playing well, so it is better to find
a big man that can defend with this team.
PS Clippers could still sign Pierce for 3.5 mill tax payer MLE. Would be perfect. Could
even start Pierce for say 20-25 mpg and use Stephenson as a defensive
specialist/ballhandler 6th man.
I am not a fan of Stephenson at all and think he is a head case but if that is all we are
giving up it is definitely worth a look. I say pull the trigger and hope Stephenson
has a bounce back year.
Maybe we can dump Crawford too for a decent player. I can see MJ going for it we all know he
isn't a good evaluator of talent heh.
He's a headcase but Crawford was supposedly going to ruin our chemistry too and he's been
amazing for our locker room. I agree now Crawford should be traded for a backup big
maybe who is physical. Then sign Pierce with Mini MLE.
Andrew818 Clipper StarterPosts: 819votes: 12
06/15/2015 - 06:21 PM
Would love this trade only if we are able to get a first rounder from Charlotte but I doubt
that happens.I'm nervous that WE might be giving up a pick.If we can somehow get a 1st
rounder and send it to Denver with Crawford for Wilson Chandler than this would be a
great offseason move imo.We would need to resign DJ and Austin as well.Than resign
Big Baby or Reggie Evans to the min.Sign Peirce to the min if possible.And finally
use the tax payers MLE on a back up for DJ.My preference would be Alexis Ajinca but
maybe even give Stoudemire a good look.He can still put up points and rebound but his
health is always going to be a concern.
PG: CP3,Rivers
SG: Redick,Stevenson,Wilcox
SF: Chandler,Peirce
PF: Blake,Big Baby/Evans
C: DJ,Ajinca/Stoudemire
david Site AdminPosts: 27632votes: 59
06/15/2015 - 06:21 PM
This is a bit iffy, but I think I'd do this trade as the team would be able to dump Hawe's
salary. That would mean though the Clippers are back to square one in terms of
finding a back up big (or no starting center if DJ leaves). Stephenson is strong
enough to play some small forward, but there is no guarantee that he is going to
revert to the player he was in 2013-14 with the Pacers.
CapsNClips CNS MVP X2Posts: 5408votes: 61
06/15/2015 - 06:22 PM
Clippersfan86 wrote:
PS Clippers could still sign Pierce for 3.5 mill tax payer MLE. Would be perfect.
Could even start Pierce for say 20-25 mpg and use Stephenson as a defensive
specialist/ballhandler 6th man.
What are the chances Pierce takes the min?
Imagine being able to use our mMLE on Lavoy Allen or Brandon Bass.
Could really turn this roster around.
CP3Heliflopter CNS MVP X2Posts: 7602votes: 14
06/15/2015 - 06:24 PM
Clippersfan86 wrote:
He's a headcase but Crawford was supposedly going to ruin our chemistry too and he's
been amazing for our locker room. I agree now Crawford should be traded for a backup
big maybe who is physical. Then sign Pierce with Mini MLE.
Crawford has never been a cancer off the court. Just a black hole who plays no D on the court and
he is getting old too which makes things worse.
That scenario would be nice. Having Pierce as a starter and Lance as a 6th man. Getting a
defensive backup big would also be very nice.
Brandon Bass is getting 7+ mill a year man. Although I'd LOVE him on the team as you would too.
Doubt Pierce takes minimum.. he's very proud. BUT if he did and we used MLE on someone
else.. we'd be in amazing shape.
OTSS Clipper RookiePosts: 82votes: 1
06/15/2015 - 06:25 PM
I am not sure if this is possible, but I hope it happen. If it does, I would be so
happy.
Yes on the trade. Hope Hornet cut Barnes contract so that they will only owe him 1 mil and
use the rest to sing other people. Then the Clippers wait for the wavier to clear and
resign Barnes to come off the bench. We still need his toughness and defense for the
second unit.
Crawford has never been a cancer off the court. Just a black hole who plays no D on the
court and he is getting old too which makes things worse.
He had a bad reputation as a chemistry ruining type, although as you said it was more on
court based. Still he was deemed a high risk option vs Ray Allen who was a more sure
bet. He ended up being a nice contributor for the last 3 years. My only gripe with
Crawford is his complete disappearing acts every year in the playoffs, which a
title hopefully CANNOT have from their 6th man.
If Stephenson can get down to his Indiana weight he will already be better than last
year. Hopefully he spends the summer working with CP and BG to get some
chemistry.
-clippernation- Clipper 6th ManPosts: 229votes: 1
06/15/2015 - 06:40 PM
The best thing that comes with Stephenson is his contract has a team option for
2016-17
sz123456 CNS MVP X1Posts: 4268votes: 33
06/15/2015 - 06:46 PM
As long as this deal is good with Pierce, gotta pull the trigger. Best part is Jamal is
not involved -- He still has a semblance of value and can be traded
later.
CapsNClips CNS MVP X2Posts: 5408votes: 61
06/15/2015 - 06:46 PM
-clippernation- wrote:
The best thing that comes with Stephenson is his contract has a team option for
2016-17
Yep, worst case scenario, he's as bad as Hawes and we have $6mil extra in cap space that we
wouldn't have with Hawes.
Best case scenario, he returns to Pacers Stephenson and becomes the lockdown defender
we've always wanted and the $9mil contract becomes a steal.
Clipper Darrell please tell Doc to pull the trigger i know you have his number text him please
we all want this he can make Lance a great player its what he does he's what we're
missing!
Even is lance flops, the clippers still clear up an additional $6M in cap space for next
summer when the cap spikes and they'll actually be a player in free agency. Big
difference in having $10M in cap space vs $16M+. Offering free agents 4 years $70M,
is a hell of a lot more attractive than 4 years $44M. We could Actually have 4 star
players!!
jarca CNS MVP ChampionPosts: 15671votes: 70
06/15/2015 - 07:16 PM
Where's Blair these days? He's a serviceable big man who can rebound
jerdogthompson Clipper 6th ManPosts: 199Location: The LBCvotes: 1
06/15/2015 - 07:18 PM
A source tells ESPN a deal is close but not definite